Fossil plant remains from millions of years ago may be the best predictor of future climate change caused by rising levels of carbon dioxide, according to a new study.
"Carbon isotopes are really important for understanding the carbon cycle of the past—and we care about the carbon cycle of the past because it gives us clues about future climate change," explains Aaron Diefendorf, a graduate student in geosciences at Penn State.
Carbon naturally occurs in two non-radioactive isotopes—different forms of the same element—carbon 12 and carbon 13. Plants absorb carbon from the atmosphere as carbon dioxide.
The ratio of carbon 12 to carbon 13 within a plant mirrors the ratio in the atmosphere, which varies with changes in the carbon cycle—the cycling of the element carbon through plants and animals, the ocean, the atmosphere, and Earth’s crust.
Clues about how the environment responded to global warming events millions of years ago can be found in carbon isotope ratios from ancient fossil leaves, sediments, and pollen. However, environmental conditions also affect leaf carbon isotope ratios.
Two graduate students, Diefendorf and Mueller, looked at published carbon isotope values from more than 3000 modern plants, including a variety of plant types from diverse environments.
Modern plant data allowed the researchers to examine how plant type, altitude, and water availability affect the exchange of carbon isotopes between leaves and the atmosphere.
“The relationship between temperature and carbon dioxide is really important to understand future climate change,” explains Diefendorf.
Carbon isotope ratios in plants are strongly influenced by water availability.
The relationship between water and leaf carbon isotope values has long been known to ecologists, but had not been observed at the global scale. The carbon isotope ratio was also dependent on plant type: evergreen or deciduous.
To properly estimate carbon isotope ratios from the past, future research must account for how water and plant type affect the relationship between atmospheric and leaf carbon isotope values.
Temperature records along with accurate estimates of the past atmospheric-carbon-isotope values enable scientists to better understand how much warming is carbon-cycle-perturbation produced. This is applicable to the present rise in carbon dioxide.
The researchers believe the environmental relationships highlighted in their study can be used to modify existing climate records to produce a more accurate, robust account of past atmospheric conditions and how it correlates with temperature change.
“We know that climate is warming from increases in greenhouse gases as a result of human behaviour—the science is clear—but understanding the additional feedbacks in the climate system that amplify this warming are crucial to understand future climate change,” says Diefendorf.
As the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere continues to rise, it is critical to use prehistoric events as models for how to control and adjust to the rapidly changing carbon cycle.
“What we hope is that by using this approach (the patterns and relationships their research provides), we are going to get a better value for the carbon isotope ratio in the atmosphere, which you then plug into your model and get a better estimate for climate sensitivity,” concludes Mueller.
Researchers from the University of California at Santa Cruz and the Smithsonian Institution contributed to the study, which was supported by the National Science Foundation and fellowships awarded to Diefendorf and Mueller from the Penn State Biogeochemical Research Initiative for Education.
See this article in Tree Fruit Dec 2015
